Marine insurer Gard has recorded a sharp increase in sulfur-related bunker claims, linking the rise to intensified fuel inspections by Chinese maritime authorities, according to an article published by Ship & Bunker.
According to Ship & Bunker, citing Gard, the number of sulfur-related claims more than tripled in the first half of 2026 compared with the same period a year earlier. Gard also noted that the first-half 2026 total already exceeded the full-year figure for 2025 by roughly 40%.
Bohai Sea Campaign Drives Scrutiny
The surge in claims coincides with a joint pollution control campaign led by the China Maritime Safety Administration (MSA) and local maritime authorities in the Bohai Sea, Ship & Bunker reports. MSA offices in Tianjin, Hebei, Liaoning and Shandong launched the initiative on June 5, covering major ports including Tianjin, Tangshan, Qinhuangdao, Huanghua, Jinzhou, Yingkou and Longkou.
As part of the campaign, authorities are conducting fuel sampling, onboard inspections, and reviews of bunker delivery notes, fuel test reports and fuel management records, according to the report.
Panjin Case Highlighted
Gard, as cited by Ship & Bunker, pointed to a recent incident in Panjin where China MSA officers detected fuel with a sulfur content of 2.51%, after initial testing indicated a range between 2.5% and 2.7%. The vessel involved was ordered to halt use of the fuel and submit a disposal plan while the investigation proceeded.
Ships found using fuel that does not meet Chinese sulfur requirements can face fines ranging from RMB 10,000 to RMB 100,000, Ship & Bunker reports, citing Gard.
In response, Gard has urged owners and operators to carefully verify fuel quality and to retain bunker samples and supporting documentation in case of inspections or subsequent claims, according to the report.
Does This Matter to You?
Vessel operators calling at Bohai Sea ports, including Tianjin, Tangshan, Qinhuangdao, Huanghua, Jinzhou, Yingkou and Longkou, may face a higher likelihood of fuel inspections during the current campaign, based on the details reported by Ship & Bunker. Bunker traders and suppliers serving these routes may also want to ensure documentation, including bunker delivery notes and fuel test reports, is accurate and readily available.
Given the fines outlined in the report and the tripling of claims cited by Gard, retaining bunker samples and thorough records appears to be a practical safeguard for parties operating in the affected region. Beyond this, the source material does not detail broader implications for global bunkering markets or other regions.
Gulf Bunkering does not provide operational or security guidance. This article is for informational purposes only. Operators should consult flag state authorities, P&I clubs, and relevant advisories for decisions relating to transit planning.
Sources: Ship & Bunker (citing Gard)
