Hapag-Lloyd Rejects Proposed US Hormuz Fee as “Fundamentally Wrong”

Hapag-Lloyd has pushed back against a proposed United States fee tied to transit through the Strait of Hormuz, calling the measure “fundamentally wrong,” according to ShippingWatch.

The German container line said it does not consider a proposed 20% US fee to be relevant to its operations, ShippingWatch reports. The company also denied ever having previously paid US authorities for transit through the strategically vital waterway.

Limited Details Available

According to ShippingWatch, the comments come from Hapag-Lloyd CEO Rolf Habben Jansen, amid broader industry discussion around former President Trump’s proposed Hormuz-related fee. ShippingWatch’s report does not provide further detail on the exact structure of the proposed fee, its legal basis, or a timeline for implementation.

The report is part of wider ShippingWatch coverage of tensions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz, which has also included reports on a naval blockade against Iran, Iranian threats to close other export corridors, and warnings from tanker industry figures that potential US tariffs tied to the strait could raise costs for consumers. ShippingWatch notes that other shipping executives, including Norden’s chief executive, have said they are awaiting further details on the proposed fee before commenting further.

Does This Matter to You?

Developments around a potential US fee tied to Hormuz transit could carry implications for vessel operators and container lines using the strait, depending on how any such fee is ultimately structured and enforced. Hapag-Lloyd’s public rejection of the fee’s relevance, as reported by ShippingWatch, signals that container carriers may resist compliance or dispute the fee’s applicability.

Bunker traders, charterers, and port planners monitoring Hormuz-related developments may want to track how other major carriers respond, particularly as ShippingWatch reports that tanker industry voices have separately warned of potential cost pass-through to consumers. The source material does not clarify further operational or financial impacts at this stage, and additional details on the proposed fee’s scope remain unclear based on available reporting.

Gulf Bunkering does not provide operational or security guidance. This article is for informational purposes only. Operators should consult flag state authorities, P&I clubs, and relevant advisories for decisions relating to transit planning.

Sources: ShippingWatch

Scroll to Top